IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1178 OF 2009
(ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM DCCJ NO. 4126 OF 2007)
Before: Hon Tang VP and Yeung JA
Date of Judgment: 2 November 2009
J U D G M E N T
Hon Tang VP (giving the judgment of the Court):
1. In our judgment of 5 October 2009, we said, for the reasons we gave there, we were provisionally minded to make against the applicanta restricted application order (RAO) (para. 6). We directed the applicant to lodge written submission with the Court within 14 daysif she should wish to be heard on the matter and indicated that the matter would then be decided by the Court accordingly (para.7).
2. On 19 October 2009, the applicant provided the Court with lengthy submissions. The main submission is 21 pages long. There isan Exhibit 1 which runs to 88 pages. It is unnecessary to deal with such submissions in any detail. In these documents, the applicantmounted an intemperate attack on our judgments of 4 September 2009 and 5 October 2009, as well as the judgment of District JudgeLok given on 11 June 2009. The contents of the applicant’s submission have reinforced our view that a RAO should be made.
3. We now make an order prohibiting the plaintiff from making any further application to this Court in HCMP 1178/2009, save with leaveof Tang VP (or another judge designated by the Chief Judge, High Court).