LAW WAI DUEN & ANOTHER v. B.F. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD & OTHERS

CACV001836AM/2001

CACV 1835/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1835 OF 2001

(ON APPEAL FROM HCMP NO. 702 OF 2001)

_________________________

IN THE MATTER OF BOLDWIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED

AND

IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance, Chapter 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong

_________________________

BETWEEN
LAW WAI DUEN Plaintiff
AND
BOLDWIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED 1st Defendant
CHAN SHIU CHICK 2nd Defendant

_________________________

CACV 1836/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1836 OF 2001

(ON APPEAL FROM HCMP NO. 703 OF 2001)

_________________________

IN THE MATTER OF B.F. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED

AND

IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance, Chapter 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong

_________________________

BETWEEN
LAW WAI DUEN 1st Plaintiff
CHAN NGA WAI, ANN 2nd Plaintiff
AND
B.F. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED 1st Defendant
CHAN SHIU CHICK 2nd Defendant
YIP HING WAH 3rd Defendant

_________________________

Coram: Hon Rogers VP, Le Pichon JA and Sakhrani J in Court

Date of Hearing: 9 November 2001

Date of Decision: 9 November 2001

Date of Handing Down of Reasons for Decision: 5 December 2001

_________________________

C O R R I G E N D A

_________________________

On page 5 – the last line “proved need” should read “proved the need”.

On page 6 – on the 14th line “$14 million” should read “$40 million”.

(Kitty Leung)
Clerk to the Hon Mr Justice Rogers VP