LAMMAS GLOBAL CORPORATION v. BARCLAYS BANK (SUISSE) S.A. AND OTHERS

HCA 2411/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 2411 OF 2009

____________

BETWEEN

LAMMAS GLOBAL CORPORATION Plaintiff
and
BARCLAYS BANK (SUISSE) S.A. 1st Defendant
BARCLAYS BANK PLC 2nd Defendant
BARCLAYS PRIVATE BANK & TRUST LIMITED 3rd Defendant
BARCLAYS PRIVATE BANK & TRUST (CAYMAN) LIMITED 4th Defendant
BARCLAYS PRIVATE BANK & TRUST (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED 5th Defendant
BARCLAYS PRIVATE ASSET MANAGEMENT (MONACO) SAM 6th Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Saunders J in Chambers

Dates of Written Submissions: 27 April, 20 & 27 May 2011

Date of Decision on Costs: 3 June 2011

_______________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision on Costs of the above-mentioned case handed down on 3 June 2011:-

Page 6, between line (B)
and line (D)

“That alone was enough to entitle me to reject the evidence of Professor Jeandin, where there was a difference between him and Mr.Marguerat.” should be substituted by “That alone was enough to entitle me to reject the evidence of Mr. Marguerat, where therewas a difference between him and Professor Jeandin.”

Dated the 9th day of June 2011.

(Vicky Wong) (Miss)
Clerk to The Honourable Mr. Justice Saunders