IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 509 OF 1996
(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC 68 OF 1996)
Coram: Hon Stuart-Moore VP, Stock JA and Hartmann J
Date of Hearing: 23 August 2002
Date of Judgment: 23 August 2002
J U D G M E N T
Stuart-Moore VP (giving the judgment of the Court):
1. The Applicant was convicted of murder on 4 September 1996 and sentenced to life imprisonment. His appeal against conviction was dismissedon 3 April 1997.
2. On 25 January 2002, the Applicant sought leave out of time to appeal against sentence, setting out his reasons for doing so in anaffirmation.
3. The application is misconceived. Murder carries only one sentence which is provided by section 2 of the Offences Against the Person Ordinance, Cap. 212. This was recently challenged in Lau Cheong and Anor v HKSAR, FACC 6/2001 (unreported). The judgment, at paragraph 164 reads:
4. This passage makes it clear that an appeal against conviction satisfies the right of a person convicted of an offence carrying amandatory life sentence to have his conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher tribunal. There is no right to appeal in such acase solely against sentence.
5. There are, however, topics which are raised in the Applicant’s leave application which, if correct, are no doubt matters for theconsideration of the Long Term Prison Review Board. We are led to believe from correspondence sent to the Applicant by the LegalAid Department that he may in due course receive some legal advice as to what his proper course should be.
6. So far as this court is concerned, we have no jurisdiction to entertain the application. Accordingly, we refuse to give leave outof time and the application is dismissed.
Mr Gavin Shiu, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.
Applicant in person.