CHENG YUN NAM v. TAO WING YIN T/A TAO KEE ENGINEERING CO. AND ANOTHER

DCEC000377/1999

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 377 OF 1999

BETWEEN
Cheng Yun-nam Applicant
AND
Tao Wing-yin trading as Tao Kee Engineering Company 1st Respondent
Gammon Construction Limited 2nd Respondent

Coram: Judge Carlson in Court

Date of Judgment: 5 February 2001

___________________

R U L I N G

___________________

1. It is now an hour and five minutes after the matter should have started. The applicant is not here. He has made no contact with thecourt. I shall dismiss his application with costs to the respondents to be taxed if not agreed.

2. A summons to issue to the applicant to show cause why the periodical payments made to him under these proceedings should now notbe repaid by him to the respondents.

Ian Carlson
District Court Judge

Representation:

Present: Applicant, in person, absent

Miss C Kwan, of Ip Kwan & Co., for both Respondents

The Hospital Authority, in person, absent

The Department of Health, in person, absent

I/we certify that to the best of my/our ability and skill, the foregoing is a true transcript of the audio recording of the aboveproceedings.

………………………………………..
Liz Shore

6 February 2001