IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 3043 OF 2014
(ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM HCA NO 2134 OF 2013)
At page 2, paragraph 3, line P and Q : the words “The judge concluded that the first ground was not capable of belief, but acceptedthat the defendant was an unlicensed moneylender ” should be amended as “The judge concluded that the first ground was not capableof belief, but accepted that the plaintiff was an unlicensed moneylender ”.
Dated this the 7th January 2015